Keep
UNESCO World Heritage Committee Draft Decision text published ahead of 48th Session...
List of outstanding and unresolved issues grows as State Parties fail to respond to World Heritage Centre requests...
Committee yet again fails to address recent and proposed tourism developments within Site's 'No New Development' Zone...
Yet further delays to finalisation of new Joint Management Plan - five years and counting to develop draft a management plan covering a five year period.
UNESCO have released the draft papers and reports to be considered by the World Heritage Committee at its forthcoming 48th session, to be held at Busan, Republic of Korea over 19th-29th July 2026. The documents are available to download from the UNESCO website here.
The World Heritage Centre's overview and the Committee's draft Decision text relating to the Mosi-oa-Tunya/Victoria Falls World Heritage Site is published within document WHC/26/48.COM/7B.Add (UNESCO/World Heritage Centre, 2026), and presented below in full for ease of reference.
The Committee is due to
consider its response to the latest State of
Mosi-oa-Tunya Resort Development (Zambia)
Under 'Current Conservation Issues' the text highlights lack of clarification of the status of mitigation measures, originally requested in 2024, relating to the Mosi-oa-Tunya Resort development in Zambia, constructed in 2021/2 "without fully meeting all the approval conditions set out in the Zambian Environmental Management Authority (ZEMA) Decision Letter" and currently managed as the Radisson Blu Mosi-oa-Tunya Resort.
"While it is reported that the completed
construction of the Mosi-oa-Tunya Livingstone Resort Hotel does not adversely
affect the OUV of the property, the 2022 Reactive Monitoring mission identified
numerous shortfalls and non-compliance with the World Heritage status of the
property, including differing interpretations of zoning terms. Given that the
project has already been completed, and in light of the concerns raised by the
mission and in previous Committee Decisions, the information provided by the
State Party does not demonstrate whether the mitigation measures previously
reported are being implemented to adequately address negative impacts on the
property’s OUV. The development of a comprehensive Environmental and Social
Management Plan (ESMP), as recommended in the 2022 reactive monitoring mission,
and already mentioned in the report submitted by the States Parties in February
2024, is even more urgent to ensure that the mitigation and monitoring
initiatives put in place also consider the visual integrity and cumulative
effects of the project. In addition, the reported review of the 2007 Zonation
Scheme should be expedited to clarify the inconsistencies and refine the
associated permissible-use thresholds."
In summary this issue has not been progressed, by either the World Heritage Centre or the State Party, since the Committee's 2024 decision and request for mitigation measures. This development was pushed ahead without notification or disclosure to UNESCO during 2021, and continued despite requests from the World Heritage Centre to suspend development pending review of the proposals. A subsequent IUCN/UNESCO Reactive Monitoring Mission Report highlighted several significant issues of non-compliance with national planning approvals (UNESCO/World Heritage Centre, 2023a).
Baines Restaurant and Cataract Island Tours (Zimbabwe)
The text also notes no update has yet to be given in relation to the launch of tours to Cataract Island in 2022 and development of the Baines Restaurant over 2022/3. The Committee's belated draft reaction to these developments, following up on an unanswered request for further details from the World Heritage Centre on 14th March 2023 (UNESCO/World Heritage Centre, 2023b), is to merely state:
"Finally, no update was provided regarding the
third-party concerns related to permits for two commercial tourism developments
in highly sensitive zones of the property, notably
So nothing has been progressed on this key issue, by either party, since the sending of a letter by the World Heritage Committee in March 2023. Tours to Cataract Island were launched in 2021 without notification or disclosure to UNESCO, despite a previous request from the World Heritage Committee for a full EIA disclosure in 2017 in specific reference to this proposal (World Heritage Committee, 2017).
The area of the Baines development has been protected against development since 1904 with the formation of the Victoria Falls Park. It was declared a National Monument in 1937 in recognition of its cultural heritage significance and protected a a National Park in 1952 in recognition of its conservation and environmental importance. In the mid-1970s it was part of an area declared 'permanently protected' against all new development under the Victoria Falls Outline Plan, before being designated as a World Heritage Site in 1989. Under the 2007 and 2016 joint management plans the area was declared part of the 'Highly Ecologically Sensitive Zone' (HESZ) which prevents all new development. Yet despite all these protections the development was pushed ahead during 2022, without prior notification or disclosure to UNESCO and despite a legal challenge against its development in the Zimbabwean courts (still to be heard), and has been operational since 2023 (Keep Victoria Falls Wild, September 2023; June 2025; April 2026).
The EIA approval was granted on the basis of the false claim that the site of the development was within the 'Medium Ecologically Sensitive Zone' (MESZ) and a permissible development - when it is in fact in the High Ecologically Sensitive Zone which prevents all new development. Even if it was in the MESZ it would still not be a permissible development.
Further Developments (Zimbabwe)
The text also indicates the World Heritage Centre sent the State Parties a letter in September 2024 requesting information relating to proposed tourism developments within the Site's 'no new development' zone (the 'Highly Ecologically Sensitive Zone' or HESZ) - sadly not specified but believed to relate to the lease agreements, already signed with third parties, for the development of the proposed riverside 'tree lodges' and Kandahar Camp developments on the southern, Zimbabwean, side of the Falls. Not surprisingly, eighteen months later, the World Heritage Centre has not had any response to this request.
"In a letter dated 25 September 2024, the World Heritage Centre transmitted to the State Party of Zimbabwe, for comments, third-party information reporting the issuance of several commercial sites for tourism developments in contradiction to the existing JIMP within the property. No response has been received from the State Party at the time of writing this report."
So yet again, absolutely no progress on this issue since 2024.
Draft Decision Text
In its Draft Decision text the World Heritage Committee:
"4. Expresses serious concern that cumulative impacts from large-scale infrastructure and ever-increasing tourism development within the property, its buffer zone, and wider setting continue to pose a significant threat to the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property, a situation exacerbated, among other things, by the fact that several development projects, which the States Parties have indicated to be at the scoping stage, are currently underway, and invites the States Parties to provide further details on the reported development projects that are under consideration as soon as more information is available: ...
"6. Notes with regret that no update was provided regarding the third-party concerns related to permits for two commercial tourism developments in highly sensitive zones on the Zimbabwean component of the property, noting that information available online indicates that these developments have already commenced operation, expresses its deep concern about the potentially irreversible impacts of these projects on the integrity and the visual attributes of the property and urgently requests the States Parties to report on the monitoring and mitigation measures in place to ensure that the infrastructures do not negatively affect the OUV of the property;
"7. Also notes with regret that the construction of the Mosi-oa-Tunya Livingstone Resort Hotel proceeded without fully meeting approval conditions at the national level and following the Committee’s request to halt further activities until the Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) had been submitted and reviewed, and reiterates its requests to the States Parties to implement the 2022 Reactive monitoring mission recommendation to develop a comprehensive Environmental and Social Management plan, which the States Parties indicated in their 2024 report was already being developed, ensuring that the mitigation measures put in place take into account the visual integrity and cumulative effects of the project and address its negative impacts on the property’s OUV;
"8. Also reiterates its request to the States Parties to ensure that any project located within the property, its buffer zone, and wider setting with potential impacts on the OUV is subject to assessment through ESIA or HIA in conformity with the Guidance and Toolkit for Impact Assessments in a World Heritage Context and submitted for review prior to any decision; "
Joint Management Plan
Regarding the draft Joint Management Plan for the site, the text raises several specific concerns to be addressed in a revised draft, to be submitted as part of an 'interim report' by 1st February 2027, but which will not presumably be considered by the Committee until mid-2028.
"13. Finally requests the States Parties to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2027, an interim report including a copy of the updated JIMP, taking into consideration the comments outlined above, and by 1 December 2027, an updated report on the State of Conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 50th session."
The new five-year Joint Management Plan for the Site was originally due for submission by end of June 2024, with UNESCO agreeing an extension until June 2025 to allow 'finalisation' of the plan (World Heritage Committee, 2024). The new plan was subsequently submitted in December 2025, but with key sections missing (Keep Victoria Falls Wild, January 2026). It will now be at least mid-2028 before the 'final' version will be reviewed by the World Heritage Committee, meaning that it will have taken more than five years to develop a five year management plan.
Continued Failings
The State Party representatives on both sides of the river will no doubt yet again be patting each other on the back for successfully delaying any significant review of tourism developments at the Site by the Committee until 2028. The World Heritage Committee's current draft decision text actually undermines long-standing conservation protections preventing development.
The failure of the State Parties to respond to previous Committee requests for further information relating to the Baines Restaurant and Cataract Island tours, and failure of the Committee to previously react to these developments, despite full particulars being supplied by 'third-parties', mean that these operations will have been operational for several years before the World Heritage Committee has even officially acknowledged their existence. The Draft Decision text response to the State Parties failure to notify the Committee in advance of this development, the flawed EIA report and subsequent EIA approvals is to merely request "the States Parties to report on the monitoring and mitigation measures in place to ensure that the infrastructures do not negatively affect the OUV of the property" is totally inadequate.
The Draft Decision text as it currently stands is, considering the background the Baines Restaurant development and its location, a complete capitulation. The only mitigation measure which will ensure that the Baines Restaurant development does not negatively affect the OUV of the property, or more to the point infringe existing legal protections, is its total and absolute removal from the site. The Committee should, and indeed must, call for the upholding of these protections and for the development to be removed and the area fully restored to its natural aspect. Failure to comply should result in the Site being listed on the World Heritage Site List of Sites in Danger.
The Committee's continued
failure to fully address the issues relating to this and other tourism
developments, including the proposed 'tree
lodge' development, for which plans are well advanced (the development is
reportedly to be managed under InterContinental Hotel Group's exclusive 'Six
Senses' brand), at the current 48th Session risks legitimising inappropriate
developments which threaten the future World Heritage status of the Site.
Requesting mitigation measures on a completely illegitimate development, after
it has been constructed without notification to UNESCO is not an acceptable
compromise in this example, and is already proving totally ineffective in
relation to the Mosi-oa-Tunya
Resort development in
In failing to address and
progress these issues the World Heritage Committee is rapidly making itself a
significant part of the problem, and in turning a blind eye to these
developments is actually facilitating in the degradation of this Site, raising
serious questions and concerns over the whole 'World Heritage Site' system of
governance and overview in relation to natural heritage sites - with the
Victoria Falls rapidly becoming a prime case study example (Roberts, 2026).
References
Keep
Keep Victoria Falls Wild (June 2025) Special Report on the Riverine Fringe (pdf, 1.8mb)
Keep Victoria Falls Wild
(January 2026) Reaction and
Response to 2025 State of Conservation Report and 2025-2030 Draft Joint
Integrated Management Plan (pdf, 0.6mb)
Keep Victoria Falls Wild
(April 2026) Serious
Concerns Over Management of Victoria Falls World Heritage Site (pdf,
1.3mb)
Roberts, P (2026)
State Parties (2025) 2025 Victoria Falls/Mosi-oa-Tunya State of Conservation Report/Joint Integrated Management Plan (pdf download [18.9 mb], opens in a new window)
UNESCO/World Heritage Centre (2023a) Final Joint Mission
Report Mosi-oa-Tunya, Victoria Falls (Zambia/ Zimbabwe) 9-13 February 2022 (pdf
download [3.3 mb], opens in a new window)
UNESCO/World Heritage Centre (2023b)
Conservation Issues, Analysis and Conclusions (45 COM 7B.10).
UNESCO/World Heritage Centre (2026) Item 7B of the Provisional Agenda: State of Conservation of properties inscribed on the of World Heritage List (WHC/26/48.COM/7B.Add). Draft Decision text relating to the Mosi-oa-Tunya/Victoria Falls World Heritage Site.
World Heritage Committee (2017) Decisions Adopted 41COM 7B.22, point 6.
World Heritage Committee
(2024) Decisions Adopted, 46COM 7B.60, point 5d.
- - -
Full text relating to Mosi-oa-Tunya/Victoria Falls World Heritage Site:
48 COM, WHC/26/48.COM/7B.Add
Convention Concerning The Protection Of The World Cultural And Natural Heritage
Intergovernmental Committee For The Protection Of The World Cultural And Natural Heritage
Forty-eighth session, Busan,
Item 7B of the Provisional Agenda:
State of conservation of properties inscribed on the of World Heritage List
93. Mosi-oa-Tunya /
Victoria Falls (
Year of inscription on the World Heritage List: 1989
Criteria: (vii)(viii)
Year(s) of inscription on the List of World Heritage in Danger: N/A
Previous Committee
Decisions:
See page https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/509/documents/
International Assistance:
Requests approved: 6 (from 2001-2022) Total amount approved: USD 118,585 For details, see page https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/509/assistance/
UNESCO Extra-budgetary
Funds:
Total amount granted: USD
50,000 in 2015 through the UNESCO World Heritage Sustainable Tourism programme
(
Previous Monitoring Missions:
November 2006: joint World Heritage Centre / IUCN Reactive Monitoring mission; February 2022: joint UNESCO/IUCN Reactive Monitoring mission
Factors Affecting the Property Identified in Previous Reports
Air pollution
Drought
Housing (uncontrolled
urban development driven by population increase)
Impacts of tourism /
visitor / recreation
Invasive/alien species
Major visitor
accommodation and associated infrastructure
Management systems/
management plan
Solid waste
Surface water pollution
Water extraction (related
to existing hydropower production)
Water infrastructure
(Batoka Gorge Hydro Electric Scheme- downstream hydropower dam with reservoir
encroaching on the property)
Illustrative material
See page
https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/509/
Current Conservation Issues
1. On 1 December 2025, the
States Parties of Zambia and
a) The States Parties assured of the continued result-oriented and robust efforts in conducting empirical-based, data-driven, and people-centered research, as well as monitoring and management activities within and around the property;
b) A Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) on cumulative development and environmental pressure on the property was undertaken in consultation with relevant stakeholders;
c) The States Parties reiterate their dedication to the full implementation of the 2022 Reactive Monitoring mission recommendations, and regular updates on progress will be provided;
d) Significant progress has been made in addressing the increasing pressure from tourism infrastructure, including the finalization and submission of the draft Joint Integrated Management Plan (JIMP) along with this report, while awaiting its validation by the Joint Technical Committee (JTC), before resubmission to the World Heritage Centre, as well as on matters such as the delineation of the precise boundaries of the property and its buffer zone, and the harmonization of national and transboundary plans and policy documents;
e) The Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) for the proposed Batoka Gorge Hydro Electric Scheme (BGHES) is being revised in conformity with the Guidance and Toolkit for Impact Assessments in a World Heritage Context and will be submitted to the World Heritage Centre prior to final decision;
f) The construction of the Mosi-oa-Tunya Livingstone Resort Hotel proceeded without fully meeting all the approval conditions set out in the Zambian Environmental Management Authority (ZEMA) Decision Letter. A review of inconsistencies in the 2007 Zonation Scheme and its associated permissible-use thresholds is ongoing;
g) A boundary modification is reported to have been formally submitted to the World Heritage Centre in conformity with the Operational Guidelines;
h) Joint site protection measures focusing on invasive species control, fire management, visitor management, community engagement, environmental education, enhanced conservation, and law enforcement are in place and ongoing;
i) A number of development proposals within the property and its buffer zone have been submitted for consideration by authorities. These are mostly at the scoping stage, and EIA documents have not yet been produced. The States Parties commit to ensuring that all project developments within the property, its buffer zone, and wider setting will be subject to a comprehensive ESIA, in line with the afore-mentioned guidance, prior to any decision;
2. In a letter dated 25 September 2024, the World Heritage Centre transmitted to the State Party of Zimbabwe, for comments, third-party information reporting the issuance of several commercial sites for tourism developments in contradiction to the existing JIMP within the property. No response has been received from the State Party at the time of writing this report.
Analysis and Conclusions of the World Heritage Centre and IUCN
3. The continued cooperation between the States Parties, supported by their partners, to improve the property’s state of conservation through joint protection measures focusing on invasive species control, fire management, visitor management, community engagement, environmental education, enhanced conservation, and law enforcement is appreciated.
4. There are still concerns about the cumulative impact of large-scale infrastructure and ever-increasing tourism developments within the property, its buffer zone, and wider setting, given that several development projects, which the States Parties have indicated to be at the scoping stage, are currently underway, according to various online media outlets. Despite repeated Committee decisions and recommendations from the 2022 Reactive Monitoring mission, the delayed completion and submission of the requested SEA remains highly concerning. Without the SEA, it is difficult to adequately assess, manage, or mitigate the cumulative impacts of multiple projects on the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property, particularly in this transboundary context. It is therefore important to expedite the finalization and submission of the SEA, whilst ensuring that the newly identified projects are also considered in this process or through a Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA). The States Parties are also invited to provide further details on the reported projects that are under consideration by the authorities as soon as more information becomes available.
5. The proposed BGHES continues to pose a major potential threat to the OUV, particularly with respect to the property’s geomorphological processes, landscape integrity, visual attributes, and hydrological dynamics. Recalling that news reports in 2024 indicated plans to retender the project with new potential developers expected in 2025, no substantive updates on this project are provided in this regard. Noting the ongoing revision of the ESIA in conformity with the Guidance and Toolkit for Impact Assessments in a World Heritage Context, it should be recalled that this ESIA must explicitly assess alternative scenarios to avoid negative impacts on the OUV, as recommended by the 2022 Reactive Monitoring mission, and be submitted to the World Heritage Centre prior to taking any decision that is difficult to reverse.
6. While it is reported
that the completed construction of the Mosi-oa-Tunya Livingstone Resort Hotel
does not adversely affect the OUV of the property, the 2022 Reactive Monitoring
mission identified numerous shortfalls and non-compliance with the World
Heritage status of the property, including differing interpretations of zoning
terms. Given that the project has already been completed, and in light of the
concerns raised by the mission and in previous Committee Decisions, the
information provided by the State Party does not demonstrate whether the
mitigation measures previously reported are being implemented to adequately
address negative impacts on the property’s OUV. The development of a
comprehensive Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP), as recommended
in the 2022 reactive monitoring mission, and already mentioned in the report
submitted by the States Parties in February 2024, is even more urgent to ensure
that the mitigation and monitoring initiatives put in place also consider the
visual integrity and cumulative effects of the project. In addition, the
reported review of the 2007 Zonation Scheme should be expedited to clarify the inconsistencies
and refine the associated permissible-use thresholds. Finally, no update was
provided regarding the third-party concerns related to permits for two
commercial tourism developments in highly sensitive zones of the property,
notably
7. The transmission of the
draft JIMP 2025-2030 is appreciated, as it represents an effort towards a
coherent strategic framework grounded in a clear articulation of the OUV and
key conservation challenges, particularly development and tourism pressures.
The reinstatement of a three-tier zoning system aligned with the 2007 framework
is conceptually sound for protecting priority areas, but it needs to be
detailed sufficiently in the draft JIMP to function as an effective regulatory
tool.
The draft document lacks a finer-scale map and detailed information on the zoning system. It must also include the necessary safeguards and thresholds to mitigate developmental pressures as repeatedly requested by the Committee. In addition, the research and monitoring framework remains largely aspirational, with limited detail on methodologies, responsibilities, and how findings will inform adaptive management. The treatment of cumulative and transboundary impacts is also insufficient, particularly in relation to major developments such as the proposed BGHES and ongoing urban growth, which may significantly affect hydrological regimes, ecological connectivity, and visual integrity. The JIMP must also establish enforceable visitor carrying capacities, strictly controlled areas, and clearly define their implementation through joint governance arrangements. Without strengthening these operational, regulatory, and monitoring aspects, the JIMP remains largely strategic and may not effectively ensure the long-term protection of the property’s OUV. It is suggested that the revised version be submitted to the World Heritage Centre before its validation and future implementation.
8. The World Heritage Centre is yet to receive the reported submission for the boundary modification of the property. As requested in previous Committee Decisions and to ensure the standardization of the formal boundaries and to strengthen the legal protection of the property, the States Parties are encouraged to expedite the submission of the request for boundary modification.
Draft Decision: 48 COM 7B.93
The World Heritage Committee,
1. Having examined Document WHC/26/48.COM/7B.Add,
2. Recalling Decisions 45
COM 7B.10 and 46 COM 7B.60 adopted at its extended 45th (
3. Welcomes the continued cooperation between the States Parties, supported by their partners, to strengthen the protection of the property through joint measures, including invasive species control, monitoring, fire management, enhanced conservation actions, and law enforcement;
4. Expresses serious concern that cumulative impacts from large-scale infrastructure and ever-increasing tourism development within the property, its buffer zone, and wider setting continue to pose a significant threat to the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property, a situation exacerbated, among other things, by the fact that several development projects, which the States Parties have indicated to be at the scoping stage, are currently underway, and invites the States Parties to provide further details on the reported development projects that are under consideration as soon as more information is available;
5. Regrets the continued delay in completing and submitting the Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA), despite repeated requests and the recommendations of the 2022 mission, and urges again the States Parties to expedite its finalization with technical guidance from IUCN, as well as its official submission, while ensuring that its conclusions and recommendations are fully integrated into all planning, zoning, and development decision-making processes affecting the property, its buffer zone and wider setting;
6. Notes with regret that no update was provided regarding the third-party concerns related to permits for two commercial tourism developments in highly sensitive zones on the Zimbabwean component of the property, noting that information available online indicates that these developments have already commenced operation, expresses its deep concern about the potentially irreversible impacts of these projects on the integrity and the visual attributes of the property and urgently requests the States Parties to report on the monitoring and mitigation measures in place to ensure that the infrastructures do not negatively affect the OUV of the property;
7. Also notes with regret that the construction of the Mosi-oa-Tunya Livingstone Resort Hotel proceeded without fully meeting approval conditions at the national level and following the Committee’s request to halt further activities until the Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) had been submitted and reviewed, and reiterates its requests to the States Parties to implement the 2022 Reactive monitoring mission recommendation to develop a comprehensive Environmental and Social Management plan, which the States Parties indicated in their 2024 report was already being developed, ensuring that the mitigation measures put in place take into account the visual integrity and cumulative effects of the project and address its negative impacts on the property’s OUV;
8. Also reiterates its request to the States Parties to ensure that any project located within the property, its buffer zone, and wider setting with potential impacts on the OUV is subject to assessment through ESIA or HIA in conformity with the Guidance and Toolkit for Impact Assessments in a World Heritage Context and submitted for review prior to any decision;
9. Expresses continued concern regarding the proposed Batoka Gorge Hydro Electric Scheme (BGHES), further reiterates its request that the revised ESIA must be in full conformity with the above-mentioned guidance, including a rigorous assessment of alternative scenarios that avoid negative impacts on the OUV, as recommended by the 2022 Reactive monitoring mission, and be submitted to the World Heritage Centre for review, prior to taking any decision that is difficult to reverse;
10. Appreciates the submission of the draft Joint Integrated Management Plan (JIMP) 2025-2030, underlines that further amendment is needed to detail the zoning system of the property to function as an effective regulatory tool, as well as the operational, regulatory, and monitoring aspects, and requests the States Parties to further revise and submit the updated version of the JIMP to the World Heritage Centre for review, prior to its validation and future implementation, by:
a) Incorporating clearly defined safeguards and thresholds to mitigate against developmental pressures for the protection of the property’s OUV, and zoning of the property, including well-prescribed limits of acceptable use and permissible activities (including tourism and development infrastructures), in line with the objectives of protecting the OUV and in line with past Committee decisions,
b) Developing finer-scale maps of the zoning system to avoid any ambiguity in its implementation,
c) Establishing enforceable visitor carrying capacities and strictly controlled areas in sensitive zones,
d) Developing and operationalizing the research and monitoring framework, including the provision of detailed methodologies, the clear allocation of responsibilities, and the establishment of mechanisms to ensure that monitoring results effectively inform adaptive management,
e) Strengthening the consideration and management of cumulative and transboundary impacts on the OUV of the property, particularly of major developments such as the proposed BGHES and ongoing urban growth, including their potential effects on hydrological regimes, ecological connectivity, and visual integrity,
f) Ensuring that the JIMP is supported by adequate and sustainable financing to ensure its effective implementation, and monitoring for the long-term protection of the OUV;
11. Reiterates furthermore its request to the States Parties to submit a request for a boundary modification in accordance with the Operational Guidelines to set the precise boundaries of the property and its buffer zone, aligned with past Committee Decisions and the property’s Statement of OUV;
12. Also requests that information on the current status of all proposed development projects reported at the scoping stage, including their precise location, and scale, be submitted to the World Heritage Centre as soon as such information becomes available, with particular attention to commercial tourism developments, notably the Cataract Island tours, Baines Restaurant and Six senses eco-lodges, located in highly sensitive areas, notably Cataract Island and its riverine rainforest within the Zimbabwean component of the property;
13. Finally requests the
States Parties to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2027, an
interim report including a copy of the updated JIMP, taking into consideration
the comments outlined above, and by 1 December 2027, an updated report on the state
of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for
examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 50th session.
.jpg "Paradise Lost? Conservation and Development of Victoria Falls")
